Pay It Forward (2000) Movie Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Pay It Forward (2000) - Movie Review Example The following morning, Trevor'smother, a single mother who has been affected by alcoholism, becomes furious with Trevor after finding a stranger in their house. His Mom directly confronts Eugene and he too is very surprised by Trevor's response. Later that night back at their place, Trevor talks to his mother about her alcoholism, she gets angry and slaps him across the face. Trevor decides to run away from his house and his Mom again approaches Eugene to help her in finding him, they finally find him at a bus stop and his mom apologizes for her mistake. In the Meanwhile, Chris ajournalist is trying really hard to find out why a total stranger gifted him a brand newJaguar S-Typecar after Chris' old 1965Ford Mustangwas severely damaged in an unprecedentedaccident. The stranger's replies by saying, that he is simply "paying it forward". When Chris enquires him for some more information, the man elucidates that, when he recently visited a hospital while his daughter was suffering a severeasthmaattack, a gang member suffering from a severe stab wound actually took up a gun and forced the doctor to examine the child, the same makes Chris very curious to know about the same. Trevor tries really hard to help Jerry but fails time and again and he decides to help Eugene by making him good friends with his mother. Both of them become good friends but all this changes when her ex-husband shows up proclaiming that he has changed and she gives him another chance to sort out the differences between them. Arlene later tries really hard to explain her choice to Trevor's teacher; the audience here gets to learn that Eugene'sburnswere the result of terriblechild abuseby his father. Eugene gets very concerned not just about the abusive and violent nature of Trevor's father, but that the simple absence of a loving father could hamper the well-being of Trevor. He explains the very same thing his father. At thirteen, Eugene fled his home at the age of 13 and returned home when he was 16, he did so to take his mother along with him but his father knocked him down and burned him and the same has caused the scars on his face and chest. Trevor's mom soon realizes that his father has not changed even a bit and he still drinks alcohol and on the top of that becomes angry for no reason. She realizes her mistake and also starts thinking about Eugene. She soon discovers that Eugene has lost all his interest in the relationship. Re-Introduction of Characters The re-introduction of Jerry takes place at this point, he has moved to a different city and he rescues a woman who is about to commit suicide. Chris is also re-introduced and the movie becomes a little complicate at this point as the pay it forward movement starts. Chris's quest to find the originator of this movement is still on and he soon realizes that Trevor was the founder of this movement, Trevor is interviewed in the movie and he talks about the difficulties this movement can face and listening to his interview, Trevor's mom and Eugene decide that they must stay together. In the meanwhile, the reconciliation between Trevor's mom and Eugene is overshadowed by the death of Trevor; he dies trying to save a friend of his who was getting bullied by the seniors. The movie ends with a very positive note; the movement started by Trevor becomes a nationwide hit and more and

Marketing feasibilty analysis Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Marketing feasibilty analysis - Research Paper Example Fuze is a non-carbonated fruit drink enriched with vitamins. It is one of the most popular drinks especially among school and college students. This study will focus on the marketing feasibility for Fuze drink in Saudi Arabia. It will also cover various aspects of feasibility study. In a country like Saudi Arabia where alcoholic drinks are banned, fruit drinks like Fuze have a good prospect for growth. Effective marketing can lead to even better results (Fuze Drink, â€Å"Fuze Drink†). Feasibility study is concerned with the analysis of various determinants of forces which affect the business in order to determine whether a business opportunity is economically, technically, financially and socially feasible or not. It is used as a supportive measure for business decision making process regarding viability of any project. It helps business entrepreneurs to take a realistic view of both positive and negative aspect of an opportunity (Hoagland, â€Å"What is a feasibility study?†). Marketing feasibility study is one of the dimensions of business feasibility study, which deals with analyzing the demand and supply of the product in the market and the factors affecting them. Variables like price, place, promotion and physical evidence, which are the main Ps of marketing, are evaluated for the feasibility of the product. Pricing the product: Pricing is considered as one of the most important aspect of marketing as it is related with success and failure of any product. If the price is soaring then customers may not accept it and if it is too low, then the company may not earn profit. Fuze Beverages need to adopt a pricing policy after taking into consideration different factors like, cost in production and advertising, price of its competitor’s product, and capacity of consumers. Market segmentation: A detailed study of market is necessary if Fuze drink wants to capture market through segmentation. At first a thorough analysis of market must be done. There are a

Understanding The Childhood And The State Sociology Essay

Understanding The Childhood And The State Sociology Essay The aim of this essay is to critically analyse both case studies by Virginia Morrow using arguments from the New Sociology of Childhood. The first part of the essay will discuss the concept of new sociology of childhood by explaining what it is, why it came about and what it main claims are. It will then move on to explore the findings of the above mentioned qualitative research of a group of children between 8 and 14 years of age in relation to their perspective on what they believe families to be. Children as social actors and childrens participation are key notions in what is considered as a modern day discourse. The implications discourses have in the ways in which children are portrayed and treated within society and the influence the actions taken by people and the judgement taken by them are often the subject of social constructionists. It is also well documented that different cultures can also have different perception, so can different situations and circumstances. In recent years, researchers have developed innovative methods for undertaking research with children. It has been customary to carry out research methods which have not directly involved children, for example, the study of children on a large scale and this has led to some disagreement by some sociologist because it is seen as carrying out a survey on children rather than with children. As an alternative, researchers have shifted towards the importance of giving the child a voice as social actors and being central in any research practise. It could be argued that most sociological policies and theories have in the past regarded children as being totally dependent, incapable, and dependent on their families to function successfully within a society. However, by adopting a childrens right perspective which is compatible with theoretical developments in the new sociology of childhood can mean that children have the power, skills, knowledge and resources to protect them. Children have been identified within the international framework of human rights as deserved of special consideration. As quoted by J. Eekelar à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“the language of rights performs an important function. It acknowledges that there are certain things which we should provide for children, not just because adults think it would be nice if they had them, but because we are prepared to recognise that children want them, or can reasonably be assumed to want themà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ . (J.Eekelar Why Children? Why Rights? 2003) According to (James and Prout 1997) children are referred as active social agents and reliable informants of their own experience, who construct and shape the social structures and processes of their lives. Followers to this theory pay much attention to how children perceive the world around them and that they have their own distinctive way of looking at family life whereby the relationship is seen as a two way process with the child and the parent have a shared influence on any decisions taken. The research, by Morrow proposes that the majority of children do not want to make decision but rather would prefer to make a contribution to ther decision making process. None the less, there are some theorists who do not consider children as having sufficient protection even today. One of the sociologists is Melanie Philips who makes a case that the traditions of parenthood in the UK has broken down and that childhood simplicity has been destabilized by those with open mind which in turn could mean that children are given too many powers and rights. Other would suggest that the concept of cnew theory of childhood has become much more complicated and that there is an indication that the idea of a traditional childhood is yet again being lost. It is argued that this is not because of lack of understanding but through the lack of economic equality. Combined with the sophisticated and business-like way of living, it could be believed that childhood has somewhat been reduced as a result to the exposure to more adult information creating a child that is much more interested in everyday materialistic objects, and as such à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“expelled from the garden of childhoodà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  (Postman, 1983) According to (Leacock 1981), within the new sociology of childhood, one of the key elements is that children should be considered as social actors, and by doing this, children are then taken from the idea of being objects, and to be studied on the basis that childrens beliefs and experiences do give insight into the meaning of childhood (Callinicos,1993). The research by Virginia Morrow (1998) was undertaken to explore two current phenomena . Firstly, that children of today experience quite varied family settings on their way to adulthood The second phenomena was in relation to the changes that have occurred in recent sociological theories whereby children should be listened to and importance given to what they have to say. The study looked at what childrens perceptions were on the family unit and how this might differ between cultures and background. It appeared that for many of the children, regardless of their ethnic background, their life revolved around their family or the extended family. One of the main findings was that childrens view in the main does not concur to what is considered as stereotypical notion of what a nuclear family is. Another key finding was that all the children included words such as care,support love and respect when describing what characteristics of family. Again this was though regardless of ethnic background, where they came from or their gender. A difference was found between children of different ages, as younger children saw having children and being in a marriage as the basis to a family and backed this up with examples from their own families. Older children were more ready to look at things outside their own domain. Many of the children referred to the term relations when describing their family and many were aware that individuals were related in different ways such as through marriage or genetically. In general, children explained that families were important to them and they saw their own family as any other family in general. When the question of who was important to them, the answer was parents, especially their mothers because they provide love and care. For some of the children, their sisters and brothers were seen as important to them. It appeared from their reactions that friendship was very important so some older children, especially girls. Finally, when asked about being listened to and being able to give their opinion, the children needed to be involved in decision making and have their say in what happens to them. Some considered that they were being listened to by their families while other did not. Some of the older children however, did mentioned that making a decision was not an easy task. On reflection therefore, the aim of this essay was to analyse the above mentioned case studies taking the new sociology of childhood into consideration. It could be said that discourses offer different and contrasting ways of thinking about children and childhood and as a consequence how they are viewed and treated by society. What this discussion serves to highlight is that there are conflicting thoughts surrounding the concept of childhood and that there is no clear right or wrong way of looking at what childhood conveys.

The History of Korean Art Essay -- Korea Art History Artists Essays

The History of Korean Art The arts of Korea, while largely influenced by Chinese, are characterized by simplicity, spontaneity and naturalism. A work of Korean art is not very meticulous in tiny details. It rather tends to embrace wholeness. This seemingly indifference lies in the flexible state of mind of early Korean artists who love nature as it is. Ko Yu-sop, a Korean art scholar, defines the characteristic aspects of Korean art as "technique without technique," "planning without planning," "asymmetry" and "nonchalance." During the Three Kingdoms period (BC-AD 668), the first major period of Korean Art during recorded history, the local powers of Koguryo in the north, Paekche in the southwest, and Silla in the southeast fought for control over the Korean peninsula. Koguryo's art survived mostly in the form of fresco-type mural paintings decorating 5th and 6th century tomb chambers. The vigorous polychrome paintings represented lively everyday scenes, animals, and other stylish figures, some of which display Central Asian influences. The Paekche kingdom maintained close relations with Japan in the 6th and 7th centuries. Its art is mostly known for gracefully sculpted Buddhist images preserved in Japan. The finest example from this period is the painted wood figure of Kudara Kannon in Japan, which either was brought from Korea or was carved by one of the many Paekche artists working in Japan at the time. Silla art of the Three Kingdoms period is noted for the refinement of its metalwork. Monumental to mb mounds surrounding Kyongju, the Silla capital, is famous for a striking array of uniquely Korean ornaments, including a group of gold crowns richly decorated with masses of jade pendants and gold discs. Silla unified the Korean kingdoms into a single nation in AD 668, marking the beginning of the Great Silla period (668-918). Impressive granite monuments were constructed, including the mid 8th century pagoda of the Pulgaksa monastery and the cave temple of Sukkalam, both located near Kyongju. The Sukkalam contained a giant stone Buddha figure and fine relief carvings showing Chinese influence. Metalworkers of Silla period excelled in the creation of large bronze temple bells, which were often as tall as 13ft high. Also noteworthy are the elegant bronze figurines of Buddhist gods, such as that of Maitreya (7th century). Suppor... ...d the school library computers to find some articles that I found to be useful. I also found a couple of web sites that dealt with international art histories. And here are the sources I used to do my research. Books: McKillop, Beth. "Korean Art and Design." New York: Icon Editions, 1992. Kim, Won-yong. "Visual Arts of Korea." In Kim Won-yong. Art and Archaeology of Ancient Korea. Seoul: The Taekwang Publishing Co., 1986. Chung, Yang Mo. "The Art of Everyday Life." In Hongnam Kim, ed. Korean Arts of the Eighteenth Century: Splendor and Simplicity. New York: The Asia Society Galleries, 1993. Articles: Best, Jonathan W. "5,000 Years of Korean Art: History and History, A Review Article." The Journal of Asian Studies 40:3 (May 1981): 559-566. Kim, Won-yong. "Philosophies and Styles in Korean Art: A Prelude to the History of Korean Art." Korea Journal 19:4 (April 1979): 4-10. [Also included in Art and Archaeology of Ancient Korea. Seoul: The Taekwang Publishing Co., 1986.] Kim, Young-Kee. "Modern Art in Korea." Kukche munhwa 4:1 (1967:9): 109-142. Websites: www.Asia-art.net www.emb-korea.ottawa.on.ca/html/e_menu.htm (Embassy of the Republic of Korea)

Art Interpretation

An artist’s personal history can be a visual roadmap into their past, subconscious, and their personal reality. The purpose of this paper is to explore these idioms in the work of Gerard Ter Borch and its historical relevance to art. Gerard Ter Borch had an established rapport with his uncle Robert van Voerst, a relationship that enabled the artist to claim his niche as one of Europe’s leading court portraitists. Robert van Voerst’s ties with Charles I began Borch’s career and launched him into his fame and status.With royal backing it is no wonder that Borch kept much of his subject matter dealing with the rich and wealthy instead of the typical Dutch preclusion to the drab or mundane of human life. It is this significant turn of events that lead this discussion to Borch’s sophisticated representation of contemporary life (62). Such representations into modernity of Dutch life can be witnessed in Borch’s painting Curiosity (c. 1660). Since B orch’s family was so closely tied to an aristocratic lifestyle, it is no wonder that the artist’s work would reflect what he so intimately knew.Although the composition of the work is best seen through the use of rich fabrics (as is most of Borch’s work) what should be taken note of is his use of diagonals to illustrate the inner psychology of the characters in his work. The moment of a letter arriving has each woman in the painting ‘curious’ as to its contents, but this curiosity is best exemplified by the woman on the left leaning over the other young woman’s shoulder in order to gain a better view of the letter’s contents. This leaning of the young woman gives the painting an enigmatic feel that is not present in other of Borch’s work.A high profile woman that is a woman of so obvious a rich birth (as can be seen by her clothing) indulges in a dalliance of childish movement making the moment both entertaining and whimsical. T his whimsical nature is given further emphasis by the vast background surrounding the young ladies. That this one woman would allow herself the indulgence of something so trivial as a childish leaning forward among all that tradition and overbearing space (notice the columns in the background as well as the ornate fixture of the diagonally placed mirror) is what is so appealing about this piece of work.The reason for the letter writing with this trio of women is that Borch had a very close relationship with his half sisters, â€Å"[which] surely contributed to his affectionate sensitivity to how young women might behave on such an occasion† (76). With Borch’s obvious eye for the smallest detail a closer examination of the painting must be given, including symbolism for such objects. Of note in such objects is the watch key which precariously dangles over the edge of the table.The symbolism of such a state for a watch winding key could mean for the viewer to take specia l note of temperance which would make sense with Borch having been raised in the Eastern Netherlands and privy to that regions Protestant upbringing. Since the objects on the table are of such small stature, from the candlestick to the watch winding key to even the letter itself, the viewer may imagine that the symbolism of such objects do not have equal weight as the characters themselves; therefore, motive for the letter takes precedence over any idea of temperance.However, with Borch’s style leaning toward developing and understanding human behavior it may be worthwhile to ask Why did the artist choose to include a moral lesson in such small objects if not to make a point? Indeed, this curiosity of The Curiosity is the reason why the painting is known as a conversatiestuk or conversation piece. With such small detail making an impact on critiques and viewers alike what becomes predominately clear in studying Borch is that he continually uses small objects to emphasize his study of human behavior.Upon first looking at The Curiosity a viewer is not completely aware of all of the objects in the composition. The element of light is what makes these objects more noticeable; such as the winding key on the table’s ledge that gives off a golden hue and is further emphasized by the spaniel’s body language pointing to the key. If the element of light is to be discussed in The Curiosity then most notably the woman on the right shimmers with luminescence – her costume as well as her countenance.With such brilliance transposing the portrait it is a wonder that the woman stands at such a distance from the main action of the painting. This distance is only emphasized by Borch’s use of light on her. This leads the viewer to wonder the cause of the distance and to become enraptured by the back story of the moment of the painting and the relationship among these three women. Thus, by the use of light, Borch has made the viewer not only appr eciate a fine painting but to become engrossed in the psychology of the characters and their reasons for standing the way he has painted them.In this psychological history of the women, the viewer becomes aware of something else; a voyeuristic tone to the painting. The intimate moment of a woman opening a letter that may (by the stance of the women surrounding her) be from a lover or gentleman caller makes the viewer realize that the painter is a man, and that the interest of all of the women is of a man. Thus, the painter through these psychological stances becomes the object of the viewer’s scrutiny (76).Upon revisiting the painter as the background object of the painting, the viewer must once again re-examine the objects on the table and their significance to the painter’s life. The time piece once again must be examined not as an abstract composition of temperance but as a revelation to the viewer of the artist’s own timeframe. Time is often associated with death, thereby; the death of the painter’s uncle during this time is significant. It is the uncle who allowed him his introduction to Charles I and which thereby gained him his entrance into the art world.It seems that Borch is writing his own life history in the small objects on the table. The death of Borch’s mother Anna Bufkens would perhaps be also realistically attached to the significance to the time piece. The complex nature of the painting is revealed; the women gathering around the letter are anxious to find out the lover’s intentions but the objects on the table tell of lives and lovers past. Love quickly follows death for the viewers in Borch’s painting.With so much psychology behind the small objects involved in Borch’s painting The Curiosity it cannot be said that the painting is for mere visual enjoyment that is most definitely not a conversatiestuk –it is far more than just a simple conversation piece. Without the use of light , of lines, and of composition such nuisances of Borch’s style would be lost on the viewer. Thus, the importance of these artistic styles is what ultimately makes the painter so interesting to the art world. If Borch desired to make a moralizing message it would be to enjoy the love letters when they are coming and in time to allow for the moments of death.

The Fabiani Law Case

The Antoine Fabiani case is an international case which involved the Government of Venezuela and the government of France where the two governments agreed to get an arbitrator to put to rest on the case of M. Antonio Fabiani in the most just manner and without bias. This shows that law has no barriers and no matter how powerful in terms of government or inferior, in this case Fabiani, the law will always be just provided the best means are pursued. In this case both the Venezuelan and French governments had to sought for external help to avoid bias incase the case to be ruled in either of their judicial systems. This is a true example that law in this case international law is necessary and crucial to our society world wide and that there is no excuse to not be just since the power of law and true justice has no boundaries. Antoine Fabiani case started initially in 1891 were Fabiani who was a French national, where its decided that she cannot have a claim to pat of what he should also inherit because of her nationality. A tribunal is then set up to try and resolve the matter is set up after intervention from the French government and Mr. Fabiani after she eels justice is not done to him because all the other heirs had a claim yet she is also supposed to be one of the heirs yet he is barred due to his nationality. The two governments then result into involving a neutral party, arbitrator, so as to minimize tension s and avoid biasness who is the Swiss arbitrator who after hearing both side of the case decides that he is not competent to handle the case since he had no jurisdiction (Jan. 53). Still not satisfied, the case is taken to higher levels and the governments where another arbitrator, Dr Paul, rejects to decide on the case after knowing the case had already been decided on by a as arbitral court of Berne. He argues that the ruing was in favor of the Venezuelan government was right since it did consider the points raised by Fabiani that she was not entailed to the estate since and standard only applied to her and not the other heirs, since he was not in the agreement. The tribunal had ruled in favor of the Venezuelan government, which was the defendant, not to let Mr. Fabiani inherit who was the claimant. But also the French government had no jurisdiction on estate matters in the case sine it was the Venezuela border, but since the Mr. Fabiani was French, it had to intervene to help its national. Thus even after the President of the Swiss confederation declared that he was incompetent after another arbitrator is sought, Mr. M. de Peretti, who opposes this decision due to the fact that Claimant’s demands were not taken to consideration, n which to him they were worth considering and in effect to this award him his claims. Dr Paul acts immediately by rejecting to award the claimant his claim of, 100000 francs since there was never discussed upon by both parties prior to the case and thus declares case cannot be raised again, that is res judicata. After this ruling the case goes higher to the umpire, who holds that no party had raised any matter about the jurisdiction of the Swiss arbitrator and more over none were determined. From that fact, the umpire establishes that there Mr. Fabian’s claims were awarded in the situational protocols. This is because the claims were in fact reached upon by him. The legal technicality here is that there were various restrictions on the Swiss arbitrator in the protocol which limited his scope considerably; this had a direct effect on the un-disposed claim that would be left (Jan, 89). Moreover, the Swiss arbitrator had to effectively determine if the government of Venezuela was in any way responsible for any form of damages to Fabiani. The responsibility had to be determined in respect to the limitations of the protocol that the Swiss arbitrator’s supreme law and more notable his guidance in the case. However the limitations of the protocol were arrived at and determined in accordance to Venezuelan laws thus the bone of contention and furthermore this made arbitrator award the claim. The limitations were therefore found to be contracting to the principle law of nations due to the fact that it was more Venezuelan sided. This prompted France to intervene to help her citizen his is because it felt the odds were against him. This resulted to the matter being and international conflict due to the fact that France as a nation had intervened, thus the matter could no longer be an individual but national matter. Fabian’s claim were now having been now a national affair it were the national interests of France on the table thus resulting in this being them guarded in the global arena (Chittharanjan,373). The interests were actually France’s national welfare as well as its national honor, thus in the event that Venezuela demand any surrender of all of Antoine’s claims, France would take the responsibility to surrender all or part. Thus after that, Fabiani could now claim any other claims from hence forth from his government. However Venezuela had not entered the arbitration with the Swiss arbitrator knowing that if he was not to award any part of the intended claims to Fabiani, that everything that had been agreed upon would be left without any solution actually being affected by such a decision, and thus enable intervention by the French government. With this information and knowledge at hand there was a protocol arranged between the governments of Venezuela and France on the 24th of February of 1891 that was later on overruled by the President of the Swiss federation in 1896 putting an end to the controversial issue. After that other claims came where Mr. Fabiani had brought before the commission several demands of compensation totaling to 9,509,728. 0 bolivars, due to losses in addition to damages in the form of the items which, he claimed, had been left out by the Swiss mediator in his final award awarded in the French-Venezuelan law suit popularly referred to as the † Fabiani controversy. † Thus on December 30th 1896 the award was finally paid out, by the Government of the government of Venezuela which was made in the eyes of the law to pay Mr. Fabiani, in what is considered to be the beat form of indemnity. While referring to the protocol of the February 24th 1891 every expense, starting with the whole sum of 4,346,656. 7 bolivars, also inclusive of a constant interest rate of 5 per cent per anum from the date of the award (Bin, 167). This came by sine Mr. Fabiani argued that the respected Swiss arbitrator intentionally left it out from his final decision, for the reason that they were not included in the conditions of the modus operandi, hence confident that sums demanded by him in the claim he brought forward to the said arbitrator is seen by the preceding inclusion of the arbitrator, exercising his extensive powers of positive reception, omitted in the final consideration. Conclusion Any detail, whether a refutation of justice, proceeding the June 7th 1881, when the demand of putting to death sentence of Marseilles was brought before the high national court is in doubt those that could not put to one side with a view to prove other closing and connecting facts relating to denials of justice. That there was removal of proofs as well as allegations relating to facts entirely not at all related to the undertaking of the conciliator, which accurately consisted in deciding as to whether Venezuela was accountable for the damages that Fabiani claims he had suffered as a result of denial of justice, did not make up any explanation of law or of course of action, declaration of ineffectiveness neither of wish for jurisdiction on the side of the judge with consideration to some specifics of the claim. For once established that a number of those specifics or else the facts upon which they were brought to end were not sufficient of the necessary conditions for them to be accepted as the result of denial of impartiality. Thus consequently it’s not acceptable for them to be admitted by the arbitrator as essentials of appreciation.